Luca's meaningless thoughts   SponsorGitHub SponsorsLiberapayPaypalBuy Me A CoffeePatreonFlattr


by Leandro Lucarella on 2009- 11- 30 05:02 (updated on 2009- 11- 30 05:02)
tagged d, dynamic, en, opdispatch, patch - with 0 comment(s)

From time to time, people suggested features to make easier to add some dynamic capabilities to D. One of the suggestions was adding a way to have dynamic members. This is specially useful for things like ORMs or RPCs, so you can do something like:

auto rpc = new RPC;;

And it get automatically translated to some sort of SQL query or RPC call, using some kind of introspection at runtime. To enable this, you can translate the former to something like:


There was even a patch for this feature, but Walter didn't payed much attention and ignore this feature until a couple of days ago, when he got bored and implement it himself, on its own way =P

I think this is a very bad policy, because it discourages people to contribute code. There is no much difference between suggesting a feature and implementing it providing a patch, unless you have a very good personal relationship with Walter. You almost never will have feedback on your patch, Walter prefers to implement things himself instead of giving you feedback. This way it's very hard for people wanting to contribute to learn about the code and on how Walter wants patches to be done; and this is what discourages contributions.

I won't write again about what are the problems in the D development model, I already done that without much success (except for Andrei, who is writing better commit messages now, thanks for that! =). I just wanted to point out another thing that Walter don't get about open-source projects.

Anyway, this post is about opDispatch(), the new way of doing dynamic dispatching. Walter proposed opDynamic(), which was wrong, because it's not really dynamic, it's completely static, but it enables dynamic dispatching with a little extra work. Fortunately Michel Fortin suggested opDispatch() which is a better name.

The thing is simple, if a method m() is not found, a call to opDispatch!("m")() is tried. Since this is a template call, its a compile-time feature, but you can easily do a dynamic lookup like this:

void opDispatch(string name)(int x)
    this.dispatch(name, x);

void dispatch(string name, int x)
    // dynamic lookup

I personally like this feature, we'll see how all this turns out.